Did SEC’s Closed-Door Meeting Mark the End of XRP Lawsuit? Judge Torres Steps Aside

The post Did SEC’s Closed-Door Meeting Mark the End of XRP Lawsuit? Judge Torres Steps Aside appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Ripple vs. SEC case saw renewed speculations after the SEC’s closed-door meeting yesterday. Posts on X suggested that the agency may soon drop its appeal. One widely shared post claimed that it could be withdrawn as early as today. 

There was also confusion that the case still rests with the court, and only Judge Torres can finalize a settlement. However, former SEC attorney Marc Fagel jumped in to clarify that Judge Torres has no further role in the case. 

Judge Torres Has No Further Role In The Case.

The legal expert shared that currently, there is nothing pending before Judge Torres. She has already ruled on the matter, finding Ripple in violation of the securities law. She had also issued a $125 million penalty and enjoined the company on future violations. 

No. The parties can drop their appeals, at which time her order against Ripple takes effect. Judge Torres has no further role in this.

— Marc Fagel (@Marc_Fagel) July 4, 2025

With her ruling complete, the ball is now in the hands of the SEC and Ripple to proceed or dismiss their appeals. “The parties can drop their appeals, at which time her order against Ripple takes effect. Judge Torres has no further role in this,” he said. 

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse had recently announced the company’s intent to drop the appeal. However, Fagel had noted that no official filing has been made yet. But he expects both the parties will definitely file to dismiss their appeals. 

No Set Timeline Yet

There were expectations that the recent closed-door SEC meeting on July 3rd could bring some updates to the case. However, Fagel explains that it was very unlikely as the meeting was a part of the SEC’s regular weekly schedule, and the agenda was likely set before the recent court ruling. 

According to Fagel, although the appeals process could take weeks or much longer, but a faster resolution could also happen. Since the SEC has already voted once to dismiss, the process may be expedited, even though such approvals usually take time. There is a “no set timeframe” he said. 

5,660
0
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。