Did SEC’s Closed-Door Meeting Mark the End of XRP Lawsuit? Judge Torres Steps Aside

The post Did SEC’s Closed-Door Meeting Mark the End of XRP Lawsuit? Judge Torres Steps Aside appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Ripple vs. SEC case saw renewed speculations after the SEC’s closed-door meeting yesterday. Posts on X suggested that the agency may soon drop its appeal. One widely shared post claimed that it could be withdrawn as early as today. 

There was also confusion that the case still rests with the court, and only Judge Torres can finalize a settlement. However, former SEC attorney Marc Fagel jumped in to clarify that Judge Torres has no further role in the case. 

Judge Torres Has No Further Role In The Case.

The legal expert shared that currently, there is nothing pending before Judge Torres. She has already ruled on the matter, finding Ripple in violation of the securities law. She had also issued a $125 million penalty and enjoined the company on future violations. 

No. The parties can drop their appeals, at which time her order against Ripple takes effect. Judge Torres has no further role in this.

— Marc Fagel (@Marc_Fagel) July 4, 2025

With her ruling complete, the ball is now in the hands of the SEC and Ripple to proceed or dismiss their appeals. “The parties can drop their appeals, at which time her order against Ripple takes effect. Judge Torres has no further role in this,” he said. 

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse had recently announced the company’s intent to drop the appeal. However, Fagel had noted that no official filing has been made yet. But he expects both the parties will definitely file to dismiss their appeals. 

No Set Timeline Yet

There were expectations that the recent closed-door SEC meeting on July 3rd could bring some updates to the case. However, Fagel explains that it was very unlikely as the meeting was a part of the SEC’s regular weekly schedule, and the agenda was likely set before the recent court ruling. 

According to Fagel, although the appeals process could take weeks or much longer, but a faster resolution could also happen. Since the SEC has already voted once to dismiss, the process may be expedited, even though such approvals usually take time. There is a “no set timeframe” he said. 

5,66 k
0
Le contenu de cette page est fourni par des tiers. Sauf indication contraire, OKX n’est pas l’auteur du ou des articles cités et ne revendique aucun droit d’auteur sur le contenu. Le contenu est fourni à titre d’information uniquement et ne représente pas les opinions d’OKX. Il ne s’agit pas d’une approbation de quelque nature que ce soit et ne doit pas être considéré comme un conseil en investissement ou une sollicitation d’achat ou de vente d’actifs numériques. Dans la mesure où l’IA générative est utilisée pour fournir des résumés ou d’autres informations, ce contenu généré par IA peut être inexact ou incohérent. Veuillez lire l’article associé pour obtenir davantage de détails et d’informations. OKX n’est pas responsable du contenu hébergé sur des sites tiers. La détention d’actifs numériques, y compris les stablecoins et les NFT, implique un niveau de risque élevé et leur valeur peut considérablement fluctuer. Examinez soigneusement votre situation financière pour déterminer si le trading ou la détention d’actifs numériques vous convient.